Bet THAT title pissed ya' off, huh? "That Dusty," they'll say, "always takes it a step too far," or "That friggin AD Fascist maggot struck again," or (if you're Dawn) "Ewwwwww!"
Hah! It ain't mine! That one belongs to the LA Times, a virtual bastion of liberal ideology and Deep Thoughts.
Yeah, the left ain't the LEAST bit obsessed with race.
Can you imagine the shitstorm that would've hit if Ann Coulter or Carl Rove had made this kind of pubic analysis of Obamas negro-ness and non-threatening "dont' look like he wants to have violent monkey sex with white women" presentation?
S'ok, though, 'cause as with issues arising from our dealings with the primitive gutter "religion" of radical Islam and it's animal adherents, tolerant and inclusive liberals have a moral mandate to deal with this sort of thing.
And, worst of all, they actually believe that. Fucking incredible.
Give me Al Sharpton any day -- at least he knows he's a criminally fraudulent con-man pulling one over on a bunch of mouth-breathing marks. God save us from liberals who are actually damaged enough to believe their own bullshit.
Scumbags.
In Our Next Episode: TOTALLY justified moral outrage over making terrorists wear panties on their heads as opposed to the purity and honor involved in the Sharia killings of little girls by public stoning: An analysis of why Islam is just a big ol' misunderstood teddy bear.
Dunno, man. I thought the article was pretty spot-on: liberal white folks are looking for a magic negro to assuage their white guilt and let them know, everything's gonna be alright, we all bruthas and sistas. I read it as a slam on "racially conscious white lefties." Good stuff.
ReplyDelete"TOTALLY justified moral outrage over making terrorists wear panties on their heads"
ReplyDeleteWell, I guess that would depend WHOSE panties they were. If they were Rosie O'Dumbell's, I could understand why this is a problem...